is this a joke?
if so, it's a bad one.
years later and this "suggestion" is still being ignored?
it's far more than a suggestion. it's a serious FLAW/DESIGN DEFECT that needs to be corrected before anyone serious about organization, time management, project management, task management, etc. can take this product seriously.
one of these category icons is marginally useable, the rest are supposed to be WHAT? please, explain to me the thought process for lightning bolts, keys, etc. when they were deciding on icons. or was it just that you had a smple pack of "FUN ICONS" available to use.
icons that convey even a slight correlation to real categories are necessary or just don't have them.
i agree that it is better to allow users to add their own icons available for categories but years later and still not available? if this is any indication of the lack of talent of your programming staff, i am very wary of recommending your products to my varied clients.
can you provide some explanation why such a trivial, YES TRIVIAL, update to your programs? if so, i am happy to reconsider the rejection of your products for consideration.
thank you.
if so, it's a bad one.
years later and this "suggestion" is still being ignored?
it's far more than a suggestion. it's a serious FLAW/DESIGN DEFECT that needs to be corrected before anyone serious about organization, time management, project management, task management, etc. can take this product seriously.
one of these category icons is marginally useable, the rest are supposed to be WHAT? please, explain to me the thought process for lightning bolts, keys, etc. when they were deciding on icons. or was it just that you had a smple pack of "FUN ICONS" available to use.
icons that convey even a slight correlation to real categories are necessary or just don't have them.
i agree that it is better to allow users to add their own icons available for categories but years later and still not available? if this is any indication of the lack of talent of your programming staff, i am very wary of recommending your products to my varied clients.
can you provide some explanation why such a trivial, YES TRIVIAL, update to your programs? if so, i am happy to reconsider the rejection of your products for consideration.
thank you.